Talk:Icons

Cambiare icona shop=pet - Change shop=pet icon

non mi piace tanto l'icona per shop=pet, solo il gatto è un po limitante, almeno un cagnolino a fianco... (e/o un pesciolino o serpentello) dato che si vendono un po' tutti gli animali e non solo gatti...

I don't like the shop=pet icon, showing only the cat is restricting, maybe you can add a dog near it... (and/or a fish or a snake) because a shop usually sell different types of animals and not only cats...

Original comment by Fabri on Italian ML

Initial review

=========================

19001: If 23001 is used for an military airfield the symbol 19001 should only be used for civil airport (see 11001)

The symbol for an historic aircraft needs to be different, maybe a biplane symbol could do the trick

23002: impossible to understand

25002: difficult to recognise

34001: put a ship in the bathtub, otherwise impossible to recognise

25003: impossible to understand

16003: change the form of the hive

27003: why not use the "railway crossing" European road sign (see 27007)

35000: looks like a camp site for homosexuals :-)

23003: impossible to understand

32003: replace the man by a bus (as in 32001)

16005: misleading, use 34003 instead

29007: misleading - I only see wine bottles in the pictogram

21002: looks like an emergency exit

27005: difficult to recognise

29010: looks like the sign of a calligrapher. This is not a pictogram. Put some clothes on it, but not a letter

21004: repair the binoculars (connect the two parts)

29025: difficult to recognise

26001: impossible to understand. Needs to have the electricity symbol added

22003: looks like an eye. Why not use a light-tower symbol?

22006: the tag man_made=campanile documented in the wiki but is used only 130 times. It looks that the tag is wrong as it refers to the Swedish Klockstapel which is completely different from a "campanile". The normal tagging for a campanile is man_made=tower + tower:type= bell_tower should be covered by the same pictogram. (it's "official" and used more then 5000 times). The pictogram is misleading, as a campanile is much higher than the bell-frame shown in the pictogram (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bell_tower; https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Campanile)

(I will raise this point in the Tagging mailing list)

13004: impossible to understand. Why not use the "customs" road sign (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:BSicon_GRENZE_legende.svg)

24003: misleading; I see a mountain, but not a glacier here

22008: misleading; this is a cooling tower, not a chimney

13006: impossible to understand

35001: misleading; looks like a camp site with a bar (strange antenna)

19005: misleading; looks like a historic British phone box. Unrecognisable as a historic building

26004: missing electricity symbol. Unrecognisable without that.

19006: use a side view instead (http://4vector.com/free-vector/cannon-clip-art-110239)

19008: misleading; historic=church is a former church, no longer in use. The pictogram does not imply this.

19010: historic=farm is a former farm, no longer in use. The pictogram does not imply this. Anyway, even for a working farm, it is not very clear

19020: misleading;looks like a city wall tower, not like a fort

13007: misleading; looks like a zebra crossing (seen from the pedestrian point of view)

13008: difficult to understand without something where the chani is fixed to

13010: misleading; looks like a road bump

26005: this is a cooling tower, not a power generator (which could be also a wind power generator

26008: why does this one not have a cooling tower?

Generally for power generators: I would add the output type of power, i.e. in most cases electricity

26021: why not use the cooling tower symbol as for the biogas generator

22009: clear-cut shut not be mapped anyway, as it does not last. The pictogram does not show a clear-cut, but suggests dead trees

25007: misleading. For me this is a money lender or a lawyer

18007: misleading. There should not be a separate symbol for mini- (i.e. traversable) and "normal" (i.e. non traversable) roundabouts.

27023: difficult to understand

24007: in principle useful, but corresponds to an abandoned tag proposal (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Trees) even though it's in use

Original comment by Volker on Italian ML