Difference between revisions of "Talk:Icons"

From OSM Icons
Jump to: navigation, search
(Initial review: new section)
(Blanked the page)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
== Cambiare icona shop=pet - Change shop=pet icon ==
 
  
non mi piace tanto l'icona per shop=pet, solo il gatto è un po limitante, almeno un cagnolino a fianco... (e/o un pesciolino o serpentello) dato che si vendono un po' tutti gli animali e non solo gatti...
 
 
I don't like the shop=pet icon, showing only the cat is restricting, maybe you can add a dog near it... (and/or a fish or a snake) because a shop usually sell different types of animals and not only cats...
 
 
Original comment by Fabri on Italian ML
 
 
== Initial review ==
 
 
=====================================
 
 
19001: If 23001 is used for an military airfield the symbol 19001 should only be used for civil airport (see 11001)
 
 
The symbol for an historic aircraft needs to be different, maybe a biplane symbol could do the trick
 
 
 
23002: impossible to understand
 
 
 
25002: difficult to recognise
 
 
 
34001: put a ship in the bathtub, otherwise impossible to recognise
 
 
 
25003: impossible to understand
 
 
 
16003: change the form of the hive
 
 
 
27003: why not use the "railway crossing" European road sign (see 27007)
 
 
 
35000: looks like a camp site for homosexuals :-)
 
 
 
23003: impossible to understand
 
 
 
32003: replace the man by a bus (as in 32001)
 
 
 
16005: misleading, use 34003 instead
 
 
 
29007: misleading - I only see wine bottles in the pictogram
 
 
 
21002: looks like an emergency exit
 
 
 
27005: difficult to recognise
 
 
 
29010: looks like the sign of a calligrapher. This is not a pictogram. Put some clothes on it, but not a letter
 
 
 
21004: repair the binoculars (connect the two parts)
 
 
 
29025: difficult to recognise
 
 
 
26001: impossible to understand. Needs to have the electricity symbol added
 
 
 
22003: looks like an eye. Why not use a light-tower symbol?
 
 
 
22006: the tag man_made=campanile documented in the wiki but is used only 130 times. It looks that the tag is wrong as it refers to the Swedish Klockstapel which is completely different from a "campanile". The normal tagging for a campanile is man_made=tower + tower:type= bell_tower should be covered by the same pictogram. (it's "official" and used more then 5000 times). The pictogram is misleading, as a campanile is much higher than the bell-frame shown in the pictogram (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bell_tower; https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Campanile)
 
 
(I will raise this point in the Tagging mailing list)
 
 
 
13004: impossible to understand. Why not use the "customs" road sign (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:BSicon_GRENZE_legende.svg)
 
 
 
24003: misleading; I see a mountain, but not a glacier here
 
 
 
22008: misleading; this is a cooling tower, not a chimney
 
 
 
13006: impossible to understand
 
 
 
35001: misleading; looks like a camp site with a bar (strange antenna)
 
 
 
19005: misleading; looks like a historic British phone box. Unrecognisable as a historic building
 
 
 
26004: missing electricity symbol. Unrecognisable without that.
 
 
 
19006: use a side view instead (http://4vector.com/free-vector/cannon-clip-art-110239)
 
 
 
19008: misleading; historic=church is a former church, no longer in use. The pictogram does not imply this.
 
 
 
19010: historic=farm is a former farm, no longer in use. The pictogram does not imply this. Anyway, even for a working farm, it is not very clear
 
 
 
19020: misleading;looks like a city wall tower, not like a fort
 
 
 
13007: misleading; looks like a zebra crossing (seen from the pedestrian point of view)
 
 
 
13008: difficult to understand without something where the chani is fixed to
 
 
 
13010: misleading; looks like a road bump
 
 
 
26005: this is a cooling tower, not a power generator (which could be also a wind power generator
 
 
 
26008: why does this one not have a cooling tower?
 
 
 
Generally for power generators: I would add the output type of power, i.e. in most cases electricity
 
 
 
26021: why not use the cooling tower symbol as for the biogas generator
 
 
 
22009: clear-cut shut not be mapped anyway, as it does not last. The pictogram does not show a clear-cut, but suggests dead trees
 
 
 
25007: misleading. For me this is a money lender or a lawyer
 
 
 
18007: misleading. There should not be a separate symbol for mini- (i.e. traversable) and "normal" (i.e. non traversable) roundabouts.
 
 
 
27023: difficult to understand
 
 
 
24007: in principle useful, but corresponds to an abandoned tag proposal (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Trees) even though it's in use
 
 
Original comment by Volker on Italian ML
 

Latest revision as of 16:32, 16 March 2014