Difference between revisions of "Talk:Icons"

From OSM Icons
Jump to: navigation, search
(→‎Initial review: new section)
Line 6: Line 6:
  
 
Original comment by Fabri on Italian ML
 
Original comment by Fabri on Italian ML
 +
 +
== Initial review ==
 +
 +
=====================================
 +
 +
19001: If 23001 is used for an military airfield the symbol 19001 should only be used for civil airport (see 11001)
 +
 +
The symbol for an historic aircraft needs to be different, maybe a biplane symbol could do the trick
 +
 +
 +
23002: impossible to understand
 +
 +
 +
25002: difficult to recognise
 +
 +
 +
34001: put a ship in the bathtub, otherwise impossible to recognise
 +
 +
 +
25003: impossible to understand
 +
 +
 +
16003: change the form of the hive
 +
 +
 +
27003: why not use the "railway crossing" European road sign (see 27007)
 +
 +
 +
35000: looks like a camp site for homosexuals :-)
 +
 +
 +
23003: impossible to understand
 +
 +
 +
32003: replace the man by a bus (as in 32001)
 +
 +
 +
16005: misleading, use 34003 instead
 +
 +
 +
29007: misleading - I only see wine bottles in the pictogram
 +
 +
 +
21002: looks like an emergency exit
 +
 +
 +
27005: difficult to recognise
 +
 +
 +
29010: looks like the sign of a calligrapher. This is not a pictogram. Put some clothes on it, but not a letter
 +
 +
 +
21004: repair the binoculars (connect the two parts)
 +
 +
 +
29025: difficult to recognise
 +
 +
 +
26001: impossible to understand. Needs to have the electricity symbol added
 +
 +
 +
22003: looks like an eye. Why not use a light-tower symbol?
 +
 +
 +
22006: the tag man_made=campanile documented in the wiki but is used only 130 times. It looks that the tag is wrong as it refers to the Swedish Klockstapel which is completely different from a "campanile". The normal tagging for a campanile is man_made=tower + tower:type= bell_tower should be covered by the same pictogram. (it's "official" and used more then 5000 times). The pictogram is misleading, as a campanile is much higher than the bell-frame shown in the pictogram (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bell_tower; https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Campanile)
 +
 +
(I will raise this point in the Tagging mailing list)
 +
 +
 +
13004: impossible to understand. Why not use the "customs" road sign (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:BSicon_GRENZE_legende.svg)
 +
 +
 +
24003: misleading; I see a mountain, but not a glacier here
 +
 +
 +
22008: misleading; this is a cooling tower, not a chimney
 +
 +
 +
13006: impossible to understand
 +
 +
 +
35001: misleading; looks like a camp site with a bar (strange antenna)
 +
 +
 +
19005: misleading; looks like a historic British phone box. Unrecognisable as a historic building
 +
 +
 +
26004: missing electricity symbol. Unrecognisable without that.
 +
 +
 +
19006: use a side view instead (http://4vector.com/free-vector/cannon-clip-art-110239)
 +
 +
 +
19008: misleading; historic=church is a former church, no longer in use. The pictogram does not imply this.
 +
 +
 +
19010: historic=farm is a former farm, no longer in use. The pictogram does not imply this. Anyway, even for a working farm, it is not very clear
 +
 +
 +
19020: misleading;looks like a city wall tower, not like a fort
 +
 +
 +
13007: misleading; looks like a zebra crossing (seen from the pedestrian point of view)
 +
 +
 +
13008: difficult to understand without something where the chani is fixed to
 +
 +
 +
13010: misleading; looks like a road bump
 +
 +
 +
26005: this is a cooling tower, not a power generator (which could be also a wind power generator
 +
 +
 +
26008: why does this one not have a cooling tower?
 +
 +
 +
Generally for power generators: I would add the output type of power, i.e. in most cases electricity
 +
 +
 +
26021: why not use the cooling tower symbol as for the biogas generator
 +
 +
 +
22009: clear-cut shut not be mapped anyway, as it does not last. The pictogram does not show a clear-cut, but suggests dead trees
 +
 +
 +
25007: misleading. For me this is a money lender or a lawyer
 +
 +
 +
18007: misleading. There should not be a separate symbol for mini- (i.e. traversable) and "normal" (i.e. non traversable) roundabouts.
 +
 +
 +
27023: difficult to understand
 +
 +
 +
24007: in principle useful, but corresponds to an abandoned tag proposal (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Trees) even though it's in use
 +
 +
Original comment by Volker on Italian ML

Revision as of 14:18, 7 February 2014

Cambiare icona shop=pet - Change shop=pet icon

non mi piace tanto l'icona per shop=pet, solo il gatto è un po limitante, almeno un cagnolino a fianco... (e/o un pesciolino o serpentello) dato che si vendono un po' tutti gli animali e non solo gatti...

I don't like the shop=pet icon, showing only the cat is restricting, maybe you can add a dog near it... (and/or a fish or a snake) because a shop usually sell different types of animals and not only cats...

Original comment by Fabri on Italian ML

Initial review

=========================

19001: If 23001 is used for an military airfield the symbol 19001 should only be used for civil airport (see 11001)

The symbol for an historic aircraft needs to be different, maybe a biplane symbol could do the trick


23002: impossible to understand


25002: difficult to recognise


34001: put a ship in the bathtub, otherwise impossible to recognise


25003: impossible to understand


16003: change the form of the hive


27003: why not use the "railway crossing" European road sign (see 27007)


35000: looks like a camp site for homosexuals :-)


23003: impossible to understand


32003: replace the man by a bus (as in 32001)


16005: misleading, use 34003 instead


29007: misleading - I only see wine bottles in the pictogram


21002: looks like an emergency exit


27005: difficult to recognise


29010: looks like the sign of a calligrapher. This is not a pictogram. Put some clothes on it, but not a letter


21004: repair the binoculars (connect the two parts)


29025: difficult to recognise


26001: impossible to understand. Needs to have the electricity symbol added


22003: looks like an eye. Why not use a light-tower symbol?


22006: the tag man_made=campanile documented in the wiki but is used only 130 times. It looks that the tag is wrong as it refers to the Swedish Klockstapel which is completely different from a "campanile". The normal tagging for a campanile is man_made=tower + tower:type= bell_tower should be covered by the same pictogram. (it's "official" and used more then 5000 times). The pictogram is misleading, as a campanile is much higher than the bell-frame shown in the pictogram (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bell_tower; https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Campanile)

(I will raise this point in the Tagging mailing list)


13004: impossible to understand. Why not use the "customs" road sign (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:BSicon_GRENZE_legende.svg)


24003: misleading; I see a mountain, but not a glacier here


22008: misleading; this is a cooling tower, not a chimney


13006: impossible to understand


35001: misleading; looks like a camp site with a bar (strange antenna)


19005: misleading; looks like a historic British phone box. Unrecognisable as a historic building


26004: missing electricity symbol. Unrecognisable without that.


19006: use a side view instead (http://4vector.com/free-vector/cannon-clip-art-110239)


19008: misleading; historic=church is a former church, no longer in use. The pictogram does not imply this.


19010: historic=farm is a former farm, no longer in use. The pictogram does not imply this. Anyway, even for a working farm, it is not very clear


19020: misleading;looks like a city wall tower, not like a fort


13007: misleading; looks like a zebra crossing (seen from the pedestrian point of view)


13008: difficult to understand without something where the chani is fixed to


13010: misleading; looks like a road bump


26005: this is a cooling tower, not a power generator (which could be also a wind power generator


26008: why does this one not have a cooling tower?


Generally for power generators: I would add the output type of power, i.e. in most cases electricity


26021: why not use the cooling tower symbol as for the biogas generator


22009: clear-cut shut not be mapped anyway, as it does not last. The pictogram does not show a clear-cut, but suggests dead trees


25007: misleading. For me this is a money lender or a lawyer


18007: misleading. There should not be a separate symbol for mini- (i.e. traversable) and "normal" (i.e. non traversable) roundabouts.


27023: difficult to understand


24007: in principle useful, but corresponds to an abandoned tag proposal (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Trees) even though it's in use

Original comment by Volker on Italian ML

Retrieved from "http://osm-icons.org/index.php?title=Talk:Icons&oldid=2142"